This section identifies the general allocation process and
the methodology by which awards during the Application Round are made.
(1) Regional Allocation Formula. The Department shall
initially make available in each Rural Area and Urban Area of each
Uniform State Service Region (subregion) Housing Tax Credits in an
amount not less than $600,000 in each Rural and Urban subregion, consistent
with the Regional Allocation Formula developed in compliance with
Tex. Gov't Code §2306.1115. As authorized by Tex. Gov't Code §2306.111(d-3),
the Department will reserve $600,000 in housing tax credits for Applications
in rural areas in each uniform state service region. The process of
awarding the funds made available within each subregion shall follow
the process described in this section. Where a particular situation
that is not contemplated and addressed explicitly by the process described
herein, Department staff shall formulate a recommendation for the
Board's consideration based on the objectives of the regional allocation
formula together with other policies and purposes set out in Tex.
Gov't Code, Chapter 2306 and the Department shall provide the public
the opportunity to comment on and propose alternatives to such a recommendation.
In general, such a recommendation shall not involve broad reductions
in the funding request amounts solely to accommodate regional allocation
and shall not involve rearranging the competitive ranking of Applications
within a particular subregion or set-aside except as described herein.
If the Department determines that an allocation recommendation would
cause a violation of the $6 million credit limit per Applicant, the
Department will make its recommendation based on the criteria described
in §11.4(a) of this chapter (relating to Tax Credit Request,
Award Limits and Increase in Eligible Basis). The Department will
publish on its website on or before December 1 of each year, initial
estimates of Regional Allocation Formula percentages and limits of
credits available, and the calculations periodically, if those calculations
change, until the credits are fully allocated.
(2) Credits Returned and National Pool Allocated After
January 1. For any credits returned after January 1 and eligible for
reallocation (not including credit returned and reallocated under
force majeure provisions), the Department shall first return the credits
to the subregion or set-aside from which the original allocation was
made. The credits will be treated in a manner consistent with the
allocation process described in this section and may ultimately flow
from the subregion and be awarded in the collapse process to an Application
in another region, subregion or set-aside. Consistent with the allocation
process described in this section, credits that are returned to the
USDA or At-Risk Set-Asides are not eligible to flow to another subregion
or set-aside unless no eligible Applications remain in the Set-Aside
to which the credits were returned. For any credit received from the
"national pool" after the initial approval of awards in late July,
the credits will be added to any remaining credits and awarded to
the next Application on the waiting list for the state collapse, if
sufficient credits are available to meet the requirements of the Application
as may be amended after underwriting review.
(3) Award Recommendation Methodology. (§2306.6710(a)
- (f); §2306.111) The Department will assign, as described herein,
Developments for review by the program and underwriting divisions.
In general, Applications reviews will be conducted in the order described
in subparagraphs (A) - (F) of this paragraph based upon the Applicant
self-score and an initial program review. The procedure identified
in subparagraphs (A) - (F) of this paragraph will also be used in
making recommendations to the Board.
(A) USDA Set-Aside Application Selection (Step 1).
The first set of reviews will be those Applications with the highest
scores in the USDA Set-Aside until the minimum requirements stated
in §11.5(2) of this chapter (relating to Competitive HTC Set-Asides.
(§2306.111(d)) are attained. The minimum requirement may be exceeded
in order to award the full credit request or underwritten amount of
the last Application selected to meet the USDA Set-Aside requirement.
(B) At-Risk Set-Aside Application Selection (Step 2).
The second set of reviews will be those Applications with the highest
scores in the At-Risk Set-Aside statewide until the minimum requirements
stated in §11.5(3) of this chapter (relating to At-Risk Set-Aside)
are attained. This may require the minimum requirement to be exceeded
to award the full credit request or underwritten amount of the last
Application selected to meet the At-Risk Set-Aside requirement. This
step may leave less than originally anticipated in the 26 subregions
to award under the remaining steps.
(C) Initial Application Selection in Each Subregion
(Step 3). The highest scoring Applications within each of the 26 subregions
will then be selected provided there are sufficient funds within the
subregion to fully award the Application with the priorities in this
subparagraph first prioritized. Applications electing the At-Risk
or USDA Set-Asides will not be eligible to receive an award from funds
made generally available within each of the subregions. In Urban subregions
in which credits available do not allow for all of the priorities
in clauses (iii) to (v) of this subparagraph to be achieved, the priorities
will be followed in the order reflected in this subparagraph.
(i) In Uniform State Service Regions containing a county
with a population that exceeds one million, the Board may not allocate
more than the maximum percentage of credits available for Elderly
Developments, unless there are no other qualified Applications in
the subregion. The Department will, for each such Urban subregion,
calculate the maximum percentage in accordance with Tex. Gov't Code §2306.6711(h),
and will publish such percentages on its website..
(ii) In accordance with Tex. Gov't Code, §2306.6711(g),
in Uniform State Service Regions containing a county with a population
that exceeds 1.7 million, the Board shall allocate competitive tax
credits to the highest scoring Development, if any, that is part of
a concerted revitalization plan that meets the requirements of §11.9(d)(7)
(except for §11.9(d)(7)(A)(ii)(III) and §11.9(d)(7)(B)(iii)),
is located in an Urban subregion, and is within the boundaries of
a municipality with a population that exceeds 500,000.
(iii) In Urban subregions, not including the calculation
of At-Risk Applications awarded, no more than 50% of all credits in
a subregion will be awarded to Applications proposing Rehabilitation
or Reconstruction, unless only Rehabilitation or Reconstruction Applicants
are eligible in the subregion.
(iv) In Urban subregions containing a county with a
population that exceeds 950,000, the Board shall allocate competitive
tax credits to the highest scoring Development, if any, that is located
in a neighborhood which is a recipient of a HUD Choice Neighborhood
Planning or Implementation grant in the preceding five years from
the date of Application submission and funds from the HUD Choice Neighborhood
awardee are reflected in the Application's Sources and Uses.
(v) In Urban subregions containing a county with a
population that exceeds 1,000,000, the Board shall allocate competitive
tax credits to the highest scoring Development, if any, that elects
to provide a High-Quality Pre-Kindergarten (HQ Pre-K) program and
associated educational space at the Development Site that meets the
requirements of items (a)-(c) of subparagraph (C)(i)(I) of §11.101(b)(5)-
(related to Common Amenities). Developments serving a Target Population
that is Elderly or Supportive Housing are not eligible for this item.
(D) Rural Collapse (Step 4). If there are any tax credits
set-aside for Developments in a Rural Area in a specific Uniform State
Service Region (Rural subregion) that remain after award under subparagraph
(C) of this paragraph, those tax credits shall be combined into one
"pool" and then be made available in any other Rural Area in the state
to the Application in the most underserved Rural subregion as compared
to the subregion's allocation. This rural redistribution will continue
until all of the tax credits in the "pool" are allocated to Rural
Applications and at least 20% of the funds available to the State
are allocated to Applications in Rural Areas. (§2306.111(d)(3))
In the event that more than one subregion is underserved by the same
percentage, the priorities described in clauses (i) - (ii) of this
subparagraph will be used to select the next most underserved subregion:
(i) the subregion with no recommended At-Risk Applications
from the same Application Round; and
(ii) the subregion that was the most underserved during
the Application Round during the year immediately preceding the current
Application Round.
Cont'd... |
