| (a) Proportionality. The bedroom/bathroom/amenities
and square footages for Direct Loan Units must be comparable to the
bedroom/bathroom/amenities and square footages for the total number
of Units in the Development based on the amount of Direct Loan funds
requested as a percentage of total MFDL eligible costs. As a result
of this requirement, the Department will use the Proration Method
as the Cost Allocation Method in accordance with HUD CPD Notice 16-15,
except as described in subsection (b) of this section. Additionally,
the amount of Direct Loan funds requested cannot exceed the per-unit
subsidy limit described in this chapter or in the applicable NOFA.
Direct Loan Units must be provided as a percentage of each Unit Type,
in proportion to the percentage of total costs included in the Direct
Loan.
(b) Floating Units. Floating Direct Loan Units may
only float among the Units as described in the Direct Loan Contract
and Direct Loan LURA.
(1) For HOME, NSP, and TCAP RF, Direct Loan Units must
float throughout the Development unless the Development also contains
public housing Units that will receive Operating Fund or Capital Fund
assistance under Section 9 of the 1937 Act as defined in 24 CFR §5.100.
(2) For NHTF, Direct Loan Units must float throughout
the Development, except as prohibited by 24 CFR §93.203, concerning
public housing units.
(c) Unit Match Requirements.
(1) For a Development funded with NSP and/or NHTF,
a required matching contribution will result in at least one HOME
Match-Eligible Unit, in addition to the NSP and/or NHTF Units.
(2) For a Development funded with HOME, a required
matching contribution may or may not result in a HOME Match-Eligible
Unit, beyond the Department's HOME assisted Units.
(3) For a Development funded with TCAP RF in the annual
NOFA, a matching contribution in addition to the Match that the Department
counts from the TCAP RF investment will result in some amount of TCAP
RF assisted Units being considered HOME Match-Eligible Units.
(d) Minimum Affordability Period. The minimum affordability
period for all Direct Loan Units awarded under a NOFA will match the
greater of the term of the loan, or 30 years unless a lesser period
is approved by the Board. The Department reserves the right to extend
the Affordability Period for Developments that fail to meet Program
requirements.
(e) Restricted Units. If the Department is the only
source of permanent funding for the Development by virtue of equity
from HTC and MFDL funding, all Units must be income and rent restricted
under a combination of HTC and Direct Loan LURAs, regardless of the
amount of deferred Developer Fee as a permanent source. If the MFDL
funding is the only source of permanent funding for the Development,
all Units must be income and rent restricted by the Direct Loan LURA,
and all costs must be MFDL eligible, regardless of the amount of deferred
Developer Fee as a permanent source.
(f) Income Levels Committed at Time of Application.
If the Direct Loan funds are used in a Competitive or non-Competitive
HTC-Layered Development that is electing Income Averaging to qualify
under IRC §42, the Direct Loan Units required by the LURA must
continue to be provided at the income levels committed at the time
of Application. Direct Loan Unit designations may not change to meet
Income Averaging requirements.
(g) Mandatory Development Features. Development features
described under 10 TAC §11.101(b)(4) (relating to Mandatory Development
Amenities) may be selected to meet federal or state requirements,
without a change to the number or description of features (e.g. selection
of Broadband).
|
