<<Prev Rule

Texas Administrative Code

Next Rule>>
TITLE 28INSURANCE
PART 2TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CHAPTER 133GENERAL MEDICAL PROVISIONS
SUBCHAPTER DDISPUTE OF MEDICAL BILLS
RULE §133.308MDR of Medical Necessity Disputes

(a) Applicability. The applicability of this section is as follows.

  (1) This section applies to the independent review of medical necessity disputes that are filed on or after June 1, 2012. Dispute resolution requests filed prior to June 1, 2012 shall be resolved in accordance with the statutes and rules in effect at the time the request was filed.

  (2) When applicable, retrospective medical necessity disputes shall be governed by the provisions of Labor Code §413.031(n) and related rules.

  (3) All independent review organizations (IROs) performing reviews of health care under the Labor Code and Insurance Code, regardless of where the independent review activities are located, shall comply with this section. The Insurance Code, the Labor Code and related rules govern the independent review process.

(b) IRO Certification. Each IRO performing independent review of health care provided in the workers' compensation system shall be certified pursuant to Insurance Code Chapter 4202 and Chapter 12 of this title (relating to Independent Review Organizations).

(c) Professional licensing requirements. Notwithstanding Insurance Code Chapter 4202, an IRO that uses doctors to perform reviews of health care services provided under this section may only use doctors licensed to practice in Texas that hold the appropriate credentials under Chapter 180 of this title (relating to Monitoring and Enforcement). Personnel employed by or under contract with the IRO to perform independent review shall also comply with the personnel and credentialing requirements under Chapter 12 of this title.

(d) Conflicts. Conflicts of interest will be reviewed by the department consistent with the provisions of the Insurance Code §4202.008, Labor Code §413.032(b), §§12.203, 12.204, and 12.206 of this title (relating to Conflicts of Interest Prohibited, Prohibitions of Certain Activities and Relationships of Independent Review Organizations and Individuals or Entities Associated with Independent Review Organizations, and Notice of Determinations Made by Independent Review Organizations, respectively), and any other related rules. Notification of each IRO decision must include a certification by the IRO that the reviewing health care provider has certified that no known conflicts of interest exist between that health care provider and the injured employee, the injured employee's employer, the insurance carrier, the utilization review agent, any of the treating health care providers, or any of the health care providers utilized by the insurance carrier to review the case for determination prior to referral to the IRO.

(e) Monitoring. The division will monitor IROs under Labor Code §§413.002, 413.0511, and 413.0512. The division shall report the results of the monitoring of IROs to the department on at least a quarterly basis. The division will make inquiries, conduct audits, receive and investigate complaints, and take all actions permitted by the Labor Code and other applicable law against an IRO or personnel employed by or under contract with an IRO to perform independent review to determine compliance with applicable law, this section, and other applicable division rules.

(f) Requestors. The following parties may be requestors in medical necessity disputes:

  (1) In network disputes:

    (A) health care providers, or qualified pharmacy processing agents acting on behalf of a pharmacy, as described in Labor Code §413.0111, for preauthorization, concurrent, and retrospective medical necessity dispute resolution;

    (B) injured employees or a person acting on behalf of an injured employee for preauthorization, concurrent, and retrospective medical necessity dispute resolution; and

    (C) subclaimants in accordance with §§140.6, 140.7, or 140.8 of this title, as applicable.

  (2) In non-network disputes:

    (A) health care providers, or qualified pharmacy processing agents acting on behalf of a pharmacy, as described in Labor Code §413.0111, for preauthorization, concurrent, and retrospective medical necessity dispute resolution;

    (B) injured employees or injured employee's representative for preauthorization and concurrent medical necessity dispute resolution; and, for retrospective medical necessity dispute resolution when reimbursement was denied for health care paid by the injured employee; and

    (C) subclaimants in accordance with §140.6 of this title (relating to Subclaimant Status: Establishment, Rights, and Procedures), §140.7 of this title (relating to Health Care Insurer Reimbursement under Labor Code §409.0091), or §140.8 of this title (relating to Procedures for Health Care Insurers to Pursue Reimbursement of Medical Benefits under Labor Code §409.0091), as applicable.

(g) Requests. A request for independent review must be filed in the form and manner prescribed by the department. The department's IRO request form may be obtained from:

  (1) the department's website at http://www.tdi.texas.gov/; or

  (2) the Managed Care Quality Assurance Office, Mail Code LH-MCQA, Texas Department of Insurance, P.O. Box 12030, Austin, Texas 78711-2030.

(h) Timeliness. A requestor shall file a request for independent review with the insurance carrier that actually issued the adverse determination or the insurance carrier's utilization review agent (URA) that actually issued the adverse determination no later than the 45th calendar day after receipt of the insurance carrier's denial of an appeal. The insurance carrier shall notify the department of a request for an independent review within one working day from the date the request is received by the insurance carrier or its URA. In a preauthorization or concurrent review dispute request, an injured employee with a life-threatening condition, as defined in §133.305 of this subchapter (relating to MDR--General), is entitled to an immediate review by an IRO and is not required to comply with the procedures for an appeal to the insurance carrier.

(i) Dismissal. The department may dismiss a request for medical necessity dispute resolution if:

  (1) the requestor informs the department, or the department otherwise determines, that the dispute no longer exists;

  (2) the requestor is not a proper party to the dispute pursuant to subsection (f) of this section;

  (3) the department determines that the dispute involving a non-life-threatening condition has not been submitted to the insurance carrier for an appeal;

  (4) the department has previously resolved the dispute for the date(s) of health care in question;

  (5) the request for dispute resolution is untimely pursuant to subsection (h) of this section;

  (6) the request for medical necessity dispute resolution was not submitted in compliance with the provisions of this subchapter; or

  (7) the department determines that good cause otherwise exists to dismiss the request.

(j) IRO Assignment and Notification. The department shall review the request for IRO review, assign an IRO, and notify the parties about the IRO assignment consistent with the provisions of Insurance Code §4202.002(a)(1), §1305.355(a), Chapter 12, Subchapter F of this title (relating to Random Assignment of Independent Review Organizations), any other related rules, and this subchapter.

(k) Insurance Carrier Document Submission. The insurance carrier or the insurance carrier's URA shall submit the documentation required in paragraphs (1) - (6) of this subsection to the IRO not later than the third working day after the date the insurance carrier or URA receives the notice of IRO assignment. The documentation shall include:

  (1) the forms prescribed by the department for requesting IRO review;

  (2) all medical records of the injured employee in the possession of the insurance carrier or the URA that are relevant to the review, including any medical records used by the insurance carrier or the URA in making the determinations to be reviewed by the IRO;

  (3) all documents, guidelines, policies, protocols and criteria used by the insurance carrier or the URA in making the decision;

  (4) all documentation and written information submitted to the insurance carrier in support of the appeal;

  (5) the written notification of the initial adverse determination and the written adverse determination of the appeal to the insurance carrier or the insurance carrier's URA; and

  (6) any other information required by the department related to a request from an insurance carrier for the assignment of an IRO.

(l) Additional Information. The IRO shall request additional necessary information from either party or from other health care providers whose records are relevant to the review.

  (1) The party or health care providers with relevant records shall deliver the requested information to the IRO as directed by the IRO. If the health care provider requested to submit records is not a party to the dispute, the insurance carrier shall reimburse copy expenses for the requested records pursuant to §134.120 of this title (relating to Reimbursement for Medical Documentation). Parties to the dispute may not be reimbursed for copies of records sent to the IRO.

  (2) If the required documentation has not been received as requested by the IRO, the IRO shall notify the department and the department shall request the necessary documentation.

  (3) Failure to provide the requested documentation as directed by the IRO or department may result in enforcement action as authorized by statutes and rules.

(m) Designated Doctor Exam. In performing a review of medical necessity, an IRO may request that the division require an examination by a designated doctor and direct the injured employee to attend the examination pursuant to Labor Code §413.031(g) and §408.0041. The IRO request to the division must be made no later than 10 days after the IRO receives notification of assignment of the IRO. The treating doctor and insurance carrier shall forward a copy of all medical records, diagnostic reports, films, and other medical documents to the designated doctor appointed by the division, to arrive no later than three working days prior to the scheduled examination. Communication with the designated doctor is prohibited regarding issues not related to the medical necessity dispute. The designated doctor shall complete a report and file it with the IRO, in the form and manner prescribed by the division no later than seven working days after completing the examination. The designated doctor report shall address all issues as directed by the division.

(n) Time Frame for IRO Decision. The IRO will render a decision as follows:

  (1) for life-threatening conditions, no later than eight days after the IRO receipt of the dispute;

  (2) for preauthorization and concurrent medical necessity disputes, no later than the 20th day after the IRO receipt of the dispute;

  (3) for retrospective medical necessity disputes, no later than the 30th day after the IRO receipt of the IRO fee; and

  (4) if a designated doctor examination has been requested by the IRO, the above time frames begin on the date of the IRO receipt of the designated doctor report.

(o) IRO Decision. The decision shall be mailed or otherwise transmitted to the parties and to representatives of record for the parties and transmitted in the form and manner prescribed by the department within the time frames specified in this section.

  (1) The IRO decision must include:

    (A) a list of all medical records and other documents reviewed by the IRO, including the dates of those documents;

    (B) a description and the source of the screening criteria or clinical basis used in making the decision;

    (C) an analysis of, and explanation for, the decision, including the findings and conclusions used to support the decision;

    (D) a description of the qualifications of each physician or other health care provider who reviewed the decision;

    (E) a statement that clearly states whether or not medical necessity exists for each of the health care services in dispute;

    (F) a certification by the IRO that the reviewing health care provider has no known conflicts of interest pursuant to the Insurance Code Chapter 4202, Labor Code §413.032, and §12.203 of this title; and

    (G) if the IRO's decision is contrary to the division's policies or guidelines adopted under Labor Code §413.011, the IRO must indicate in the decision the specific basis for its divergence in the review of medical necessity of non-network health care.

  (2) The notification to the department shall also include certification of the date and means by which the decision was sent to the parties.

(p) Insurance Carrier Use of Peer Review Report after an IRO Decision. If an IRO decision determines that medical necessity exists for health care that the insurance carrier denied and the insurance carrier utilized a peer review report on which to base its denial, the peer review report shall not be used for subsequent medical necessity denials of the same health care services subsequently reviewed for that compensable injury.

Cont'd...

Next Page

Link to Texas Secretary of State Home Page | link to Texas Register home page | link to Texas Administrative Code home page | link to Open Meetings home page