<<Prev Rule

Texas Administrative Code

Next Rule>>
TITLE 40SOCIAL SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE
PART 19DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
CHAPTER 700CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
SUBCHAPTER QPURCHASED PROTECTIVE SERVICES
DIVISION 3REIMBURSEMENT METHODOLOGY FOR 24-HOUR CHILD CARE FACILITIES
RULE §700.1753What is the Rate-Setting Methodology for 24-Hour Residential Child-Care Reimbursements?

    (F) maternity home.

(e) For payment rates in effect for state fiscal year (SFY) 2002 and 2003, DFPS develops rate recommendations for Board consideration for emergency shelters as follows:

  (1) DFPS analyzes emergency shelter cost report information included within the rate-setting population defined in subsection (f) of this section. Emergency shelter costs are not allocated across levels of care since, for rate-setting purposes, all children in emergency shelters are considered to be at the same level of care.

  (2) For each cost report in the rate-setting population, the total costs are divided by the total number of days of care to calculate a daily rate.

  (3) The total cost per day is projected using the IPD-PCE Index from the period covered in the cost report to September 1 of the second year of the biennium, which is the middle of the biennium that the rate period covers. Information on inflation factors is specified in subsection (h) of this section.

  (4) The emergency shelter rate is established by the population's central point or central tendency. The measure of central tendency is defined as the mean, or average, of the population after applying two standard deviations above and below the mean of the total population.

(f) For payment rates in effect for state fiscal year (SFY) 2002 and 2003, level of care rates for contracted providers including child-placing agencies, residential care facilities, and emergency shelters are dependent upon provider cost report information. The following criteria applies to this cost report information:

  (1) DFPS excludes the expenses specified in §700.1805 and §700.1806 of this title (relating to Unallowable Costs and Costs Not Included in Recommended Payment Rates). Exclusions and adjustments are made during audit desk reviews and on-site audits.

  (2) DFPS includes therapy costs in its recommended payment rates for emergency shelters and for Levels of Care 3 through 6, and these costs will be considered as allowable costs for inclusion on the provider's annual cost report, only if one of the following conditions applies. The provider must access Medicaid for therapy for children in their care unless:

    (A) the child is not eligible for Medicaid or is transitioning from Medicaid Managed Care to fee-for-service Medicaid;

    (B) the necessary therapy is not a service allowable under Medicaid;

    (C) service limits have been exhausted and the provider has been denied an extension;

    (D) there are no Medicaid providers available within 45 miles that meet the needs identified in the service plan to provide the therapy; or

    (E) it is essential and in the child's best interest for a non-Medicaid provider to provide therapy to the child and arrange for a smooth coordination of services for a transition period not to exceed 90 days or 14 sessions, whichever is less. Any exception beyond the 90 days or 14 sessions must be approved by DFPS before provision of services.

  (3) DFPS may exclude from the database any cost report that is not completed according to the published methodology and the specific instructions for completion of the cost report. Reasons for exclusion of a cost report from the database include, but are not limited to:

    (A) receiving the cost report too late to be included in the database;

    (B) low occupancy;

    (C) auditor recommended exclusions;

    (D) days of service errors;

    (E) providers that do not participate in the level of care system;

    (F) providers with no public placements;

    (G) not reporting costs for a full year;

    (H) using cost estimates instead of actual costs;

    (I) not using the accrual method of accounting for reporting information on the cost report;

    (J) not reconciling between the cost report and the provider's general ledger; and

    (K) not maintaining records that support the data reported on the cost report.

  (4) DFPS requires all contracted providers to submit a cost report unless they meet one or more of the conditions in §355.105(b)(4)(D) of this chapter (relating to General Reporting and Documentation Requirements, Methods, and Procedures).

(g) For payment rates in effect for state fiscal year (SFY) 2002 and 2003, a rate-setting model is applied to child-placing agencies' and residential care facilities' cost report information included within the rate-setting population defined in subsection (f) of this section. Three allocation methodologies are used in the rate-setting model to allocate allowable costs among the levels of care of children that are served. The methodologies are explained below and are applied as follows:

  (1) The first methodology is a staffing model, validated by a statistically valid foster care time study, driven by the number of direct care and treatment coordination staff assigned to a child-placing agency or residential care facility to care for the children at different levels of care. The staffing model produces a staffing complement that is applied to direct care costs to allocate the costs among the levels of care.

    (A) Staff positions reported on the direct care labor area of the cost report are grouped into the following categories to more clearly define the staffing complement required at each level of care:

      (i) case management;

      (ii) treatment coordination;

      (iii) direct care;

      (iv) direct care administration; and

      (v) medical.

    (B) A categorized staffing complement for each Level of Care 1 through 6 is derived as follows:

      (i) A 14-day foster care time study is applied to a representative sample of residential care facilities and child-placing agencies that completed a cost report.

      (ii) Contracted staff, or employees, within the sampled facilities complete a foster care time study daily activity log that assigns half-hour units of each employee's time to the individual child(ren) with whom the employee is engaged during the time period. By correlating the distribution of the employee's time with the level of care assigned to each child, the employee's time is distributed across the Levels of Care 1 through 6.

      (iii) The foster care time study daily activity log also captures the type of activity performed. The total amount of time spent in each of these activities is a component in determining the number of staff needed in each of the categories included in the staffing complement. The activities performed include:

        (I) care and supervision;

        (II) treatment planning and coordination;

        (III) medical treatment and dental care; and

        (IV) other (administrative, managerial, training functions, or personal time).

      (iv) An analysis of the cumulative frequency distribution of these time units by level of care of all children served in the sample population, by category of staff performing the activity, and by type of activity, establishes appropriate staffing complements for each level of care in child-placing agencies and in residential care facilities. These time units by level of care are reported as values that represent the equivalent of a full-time employee. The results are reported in the following chart for incorporation into the rate-setting model:

Attached Graphic

      (v) The foster care time study should be conducted every other biennium, or as needed, if service levels substantially change.

    (C) Staff position salaries and contracted fees are reported as direct care labor costs on the cost reports. Each staff position is categorized according to the staffing complement outlined for the time study. The salaries and contracted fees for these positions are grouped into the staffing complement categories and are averaged for child-placing agencies and residential care facilities included in the rate-setting population. This results in an average salary for each staffing complement category (case management, treatment coordination, direct care, direct care administration, and medical).

    (D) The staffing complement values, as outlined in the chart at paragraph (1)(B)(iv) of this subsection, are multiplied by the appropriate average salary for each staffing complement category. The products for all of the staffing complement categories are summed for a total for each level of care for both child-placing agencies and residential care facilities. The total by level of care is multiplied by the number of days of service in each level of care, and this product is used as the primary allocation statistic for assigning each provider's direct care costs to the various levels of care.

    (E) Direct care costs include the following areas from the cost reports:

Cont'd...

Next Page Previous Page

Link to Texas Secretary of State Home Page | link to Texas Register home page | link to Texas Administrative Code home page | link to Open Meetings home page