(a) Applicability and delegation is as follows:
(1) Any application that is declared administratively
complete on or after September 1, 1999, is subject to this section.
(2) The commission delegates to the State Office of
Administrative Hearings the authority to conduct hearings designated
by the commission.
(b) The chief administrative law judge will assign
judges to hearings. When more than one judge is assigned to a hearing,
one of the judges will be designated as the presiding judge and shall
resolve all procedural questions. Evidentiary questions will ordinarily
be resolved by the judge sitting in that phase of the case, but may
be referred by that judge to the presiding judge.
(c) Judges shall have authority to:
(1) set hearing dates;
(2) convene the hearing at the time and place specified
in the notice for the hearing;
(3) establish the jurisdiction of the commission;
(4) rule on motions and on the admissibility of evidence
and amendments to pleadings;
(5) designate and align parties and establish the order
for presentation of evidence, except that the executive director and
the public interest counsel shall not be aligned with any other party;
(6) examine and administer oaths to witnesses;
(7) issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses,
or the production of papers and documents;
(8) authorize the taking of depositions and compel
other forms of discovery;
(9) set prehearing conferences and issue prehearing
orders;
(10) ensure that information and testimony are introduced
as conveniently and expeditiously as possible, including limiting
the time of argument and presentation of evidence and examination
of witnesses without unfairly prejudicing any rights of parties to
the proceeding;
(11) limit testimony to matters under the commission's
jurisdiction;
(12) continue any hearing from time to time and from
place to place;
(13) reopen the record of a hearing, before a proposal
for decision is issued, for additional evidence where necessary to
make the record more complete;
(14) impose appropriate sanctions;
(15) consider additional issues beyond the list referred
by the commission when:
(A) the issues are material;
(B) the issues are supported by evidence; and
(C) there are good reasons for the failure to supply
available information regarding the issues during the public comment
period;
(16) for permit applications filed before September
1, 2015, or applications not referred under Texas Water Code (TWC), §5.556
or §5.557, extend the proceeding beyond the maximum expected
completion date if:
(A) the judge determines that failure to grant an extension
would deprive a party of due process or another constitutional right;
or
(B) by agreement of the parties;
(17) for permit applications filed on or after September
1, 2015, and referred under TWC, §5.556 or §5.557, extend
the proceeding beyond 180 days after the first day of the preliminary
hearing or on an earlier date specified by the commission if:
(A) the judge determines that failure to grant an extension
would unduly deprive a party of due process or another constitutional
right; or
(B) by agreement of the parties with approval of the
judge;
(18) for permit applications filed on or after September
1, 2017, under TWC, §11.122(b-1), extend the proceeding beyond
270 days after the first day of the preliminary hearing or on an earlier
date specified by the commission if:
(A) the judge determines that failure to grant an extension
would unduly deprive a party of due process or another constitutional
right; or
(B) by agreement of the parities with the approval
of the judge; and
(19) exercise any other appropriate powers necessary
or convenient to carry out his responsibilities.
(d) For the purposes of subsection (c)(16), (17) and
(18) of this section, a political subdivision has the same constitutional
rights as an individual.
|
Source Note: The provisions of this §80.4 adopted to be effective September 23, 1999, 24 TexReg 8276; amended to be effective December 31, 2015, 40 TexReg 9680; amended to be effective August 16, 2018, 43 TexReg 5214 |