<<Prev Rule

Texas Administrative Code

Next Rule>>
TITLE 43TRANSPORTATION
PART 1TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER 9CONTRACT AND GRANT MANAGEMENT
SUBCHAPTER IDESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS
RULE §9.155Conflict of Interest and Ethics Policies

consultant must institute ethical walls or other safeguards required by the department.

  (9) Requests for determinations or exceptions. A consultant, proposer, or design-build contractor may submit a request to the executive director for a determination whether participation in a design-build project or the performance of particular services with respect to a design-build project would constitute a conflict of interest, or for approval of an exception to the applicability of this subsection to those services. A request for approval of an exception may be made if a consultant, proposer, or design-build contractor desires to appeal a previous determination that a conflict of interest exists. The executive director will forward a request to the department's Office of General Counsel for analysis and recommendation prior to issuing a decision. In determining whether a conflict of interest exists, or whether to approve an exception, the executive director shall consider:

    (A) the extent to which the firm or individual employee obtained access to or the ability to gain knowledge of confidential or sensitive information, procedures, policies, and processes concerning the design-build program or a particular project or procurement that could provide an unfair competitive advantage with respect to the procurement or project at issue;

    (B) the type of consulting services at issue;

    (C) the particular circumstances of each procurement;

    (D) the specialized expertise needed by the department and proposers to implement the procurement;

    (E) the past, current, or future working relationship between the consultant and the department;

    (F) the period of time between the potential conflict situation and the project at issue; and

    (G) the potential impact on the procurement and project at issue, including competition.

  (10) Multiple services. If a consultant is providing more than one category of consultant services to the department and there are differences in the standards, restrictions, and limitations applicable to those categories, the standards, restrictions, and limitations applicable to a category that are more stringent apply.

  (11) Participation on proposer or design-build contractor team. A consultant participating with respect to a design-build project as a proposer or design-build contractor, or as an equity owner, team member, consultant, or subconsultant of or to a proposer or design-build contractor, or having a financial interest in any of the foregoing entities, is eligible to provide consultant services to the department for another design-build project, provided that, when the consultant is retained to perform consultant services for the department, the restrictions in this subsection shall apply.

  (12) Restriction of services and conditions to approvals and exceptions. In instances where a written determination under paragraph (9) of this subsection that a conflict of interest does not exist, including, in particular, where the conditions prescribed in paragraph (7) of this subsection have been met, or that grants an exception to the application of this subsection, the department may still, in its discretion:

    (A) restrict the scope of services the consultant or subconsultant may be eligible to perform for the department in order to further the intent and goals of this subsection; and

    (B) condition an approval, determination, or exception as the executive director determines appropriate to further the intent and goals of this subsection, including by requiring the consultant, subconsultant, proposer, or design-build contractor to execute confidentiality agreements, institute ethical walls, or segregate certain personnel from participation in a project or the performance of consultant services.

  (13) Provisions are nonexclusive. The provisions in this subsection do not address every situation that may arise in the context of the department's design-build program nor require a particular decision or determination when faced with facts similar to those described in this subsection. The department retains the ultimate and sole discretion to determine on a case-by-case basis whether a conflict of interest exists and what actions may be appropriate to avoid, neutralize, or mitigate any actual or potential conflict, or the appearance of any conflict. Except as provided in paragraph (14) of this subsection, the provisions of this subsection shall not be construed to preclude or condone any conduct with regard to projects other than projects under a design-build contract. The department will continue to evaluate other projects based on applicable rules and its traditional conflict of interest standards.

  (14) Comprehensive development agreement projects. A consultant providing procurement or financial services with respect to a comprehensive development agreement project described in Chapter 27, Subchapter A of this title (relating to Comprehensive Development Agreements) may be a proposer or participate as an equity owner, team member, consultant, or subconsultant of or to a proposer for a design-build project, or may have a financial interest in any of the foregoing entities with respect to a design-build project, under the conditions described in paragraph (8) of this subsection.

(d) Rules of contact. In order to provide a fair and unbiased procurement process, a request for qualifications will contain rules of contact regulating communications between proposers or any of its team members and the commission, the department, and third parties involved in the procurement. Communication includes face-to-face, telephone, facsimile, electronic-mail (e-mail), or formal written communication. The rules of contact become effective upon the issuance of the request for qualifications and may be modified in the request for proposals. The rules of contact will include provisions:

  (1) prohibiting a proposer or any of its team members from communicating with another proposer or its team members with regard to the project, request for qualifications, or request for proposals, or either team's qualifications submittal or proposal;

  (2) requiring each proposer to designate one or more representatives responsible for contact with the department, and requiring the proposer to correspond with the department regarding the project, request for qualifications, or request for proposals only through the department's authorized representatives and the proposer's designated representatives;

  (3) prohibiting any ex parte communication regarding the project, request for qualifications, or request for proposals or the procurement with any member of the commission or with any department staff, advisors, contractors, or consultants involved in the procurement until the earliest of the execution and delivery of the design-build contract, the rejection of all qualifications submittals or proposals by the department, or the cancellation of the procurement;

  (4) permitting communications in exceptional circumstances and designating department personnel authorized to approve those communications, and providing that the restrictions on communications shall not preclude or restrict communications with regard to matters unrelated to the project, request for qualifications or request for proposals, or participation in public meetings of the commission or any public or proposer workshop related to the project, request for qualifications, or request for proposals;

  (5) designating a department employee not involved in the procurement to act as an ombudsman who is authorized to receive confidential communications, including questions, comments, or complaints regarding the procurement and who, after removing, to the extent practicable, any information identifying the proposer, forwards the communications to the employees designated as the department's authorized representatives; and

  (6) authorizing the executive director to disqualify a proposer from the procurement and participation in the project at issue or to impose another sanction under Chapter 10 of this title if it is determined that a proposer has engaged in any improper communications in violation of the rules of contact.

(e) Exceptions to rules of contact. Notwithstanding subsection (d)(1) of this section:

  (1) minor or specialty subcontractors that are shared between two or more proposer teams may communicate with members of each of those teams so long as those proposers establish a protocol to ensure that the subcontractor will not act as a conduit of information between the teams; and

  (2) the prohibition provided by that subsection does not apply to public discussions regarding the project, request for qualifications, or request for proposals at any department sponsored informational meetings.


Source Note: The provisions of this §9.155 adopted to be effective March 15, 2012, 37 TexReg 1780; amended to be effective September 14, 2016, 41 TexReg 7134

Previous Page

Link to Texas Secretary of State Home Page | link to Texas Register home page | link to Texas Administrative Code home page | link to Open Meetings home page