<<Prev Rule

Texas Administrative Code

Next Rule>>
TITLE 28INSURANCE
PART 2TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CHAPTER 133GENERAL MEDICAL PROVISIONS
SUBCHAPTER DDISPUTE OF MEDICAL BILLS
RULE §133.308MDR of Medical Necessity Disputes

  (1) The party or health care providers with relevant records shall deliver the requested information to the IRO as directed by the IRO. If the health care provider requested to submit records is not a party to the dispute, the insurance carrier shall reimburse copy expenses for the requested records pursuant to §134.120 of this title (relating to Reimbursement for Medical Documentation). Parties to the dispute may not be reimbursed for copies of records sent to the IRO.

  (2) If the required documentation has not been received as requested by the IRO, the IRO shall notify the department and the department shall request the necessary documentation.

  (3) Failure to provide the requested documentation as directed by the IRO or department may result in enforcement action as authorized by statutes and rules.

(m) Designated Doctor Exam. In performing a review of medical necessity, an IRO may request that the division require an examination by a designated doctor and direct the injured employee to attend the examination pursuant to Labor Code §413.031(g) and §408.0041. The IRO request to the division must be made no later than 10 days after the IRO receives notification of assignment of the IRO. The treating doctor and insurance carrier shall forward a copy of all medical records, diagnostic reports, films, and other medical documents to the designated doctor appointed by the division, to arrive no later than three working days prior to the scheduled examination. Communication with the designated doctor is prohibited regarding issues not related to the medical necessity dispute. The designated doctor shall complete a report and file it with the IRO, in the form and manner prescribed by the division no later than seven working days after completing the examination. The designated doctor report shall address all issues as directed by the division.

(n) Time Frame for IRO Decision. The IRO will render a decision as follows:

  (1) for life-threatening conditions, no later than eight days after the IRO receipt of the dispute;

  (2) for preauthorization and concurrent medical necessity disputes, no later than the 20th day after the IRO receipt of the dispute;

  (3) for retrospective medical necessity disputes, no later than the 30th day after the IRO receipt of the IRO fee; and

  (4) if a designated doctor examination has been requested by the IRO, the above time frames begin on the date of the IRO receipt of the designated doctor report.

(o) IRO Decision. The decision shall be mailed or otherwise transmitted to the parties and to representatives of record for the parties and transmitted in the form and manner prescribed by the department within the time frames specified in this section.

  (1) The IRO decision must include:

    (A) a list of all medical records and other documents reviewed by the IRO, including the dates of those documents;

    (B) a description and the source of the screening criteria or clinical basis used in making the decision;

    (C) an analysis of, and explanation for, the decision, including the findings and conclusions used to support the decision;

    (D) a description of the qualifications of each physician or other health care provider who reviewed the decision;

    (E) a statement that clearly states whether or not medical necessity exists for each of the health care services in dispute;

    (F) a certification by the IRO that the reviewing health care provider has no known conflicts of interest pursuant to the Insurance Code Chapter 4202, Labor Code §413.032, and §12.203 of this title; and

    (G) if the IRO's decision is contrary to the division's policies or guidelines adopted under Labor Code §413.011, the IRO must indicate in the decision the specific basis for its divergence in the review of medical necessity of non-network health care.

  (2) The notification to the department shall also include certification of the date and means by which the decision was sent to the parties.

(p) Insurance Carrier Use of Peer Review Report after an IRO Decision. If an IRO decision determines that medical necessity exists for health care that the insurance carrier denied and the insurance carrier utilized a peer review report on which to base its denial, the peer review report shall not be used for subsequent medical necessity denials of the same health care services subsequently reviewed for that compensable injury.

(q) IRO Fees. IRO fees will be paid in the same amounts as the IRO fees set by department rules. In addition to the specialty classifications established as tier two fees in department rules, independent review by a doctor of chiropractic shall be paid the tier two fee. IRO fees shall be paid as follows:

  (1) In network disputes, a preauthorization, concurrent, or retrospective medical necessity dispute for health care provided by a network, the insurance carrier must remit payment to the assigned IRO within 15 days after receipt of an invoice from the IRO;

  (2) In non-network disputes, IRO fees for disputes regarding non-network health care must be paid as follows:

    (A) in a preauthorization or concurrent review medical necessity dispute or retrospective medical necessity dispute resolution when reimbursement was denied for health care paid by the injured employee, the insurance carrier shall remit payment to the assigned IRO within 15 days after receipt of an invoice from the IRO.

    (B) in a retrospective medical necessity dispute, the requestor must remit payment to the assigned IRO within 15 days after receipt of an invoice from the IRO.

      (i) If the IRO fee has not been received within 15 days of the requestor's receipt of the invoice, the IRO shall notify the department and the department shall dismiss the dispute with prejudice.

      (ii) After an IRO decision is rendered, the IRO fee must be paid or refunded by the nonprevailing party as determined by the IRO in its decision.

  (3) Designated doctor examinations requested by an IRO shall be paid by the insurance carrier in accordance with the medical fee guidelines under the Labor Code and related rules.

  (4) Failure to pay or refund the IRO fee may result in enforcement action as authorized by statute and rules.

  (5) For health care not provided by a network, the non-prevailing party to a retrospective medical necessity dispute must pay or refund the IRO fee to the prevailing party upon receipt of the IRO decision, but not later than 15 days regardless of whether an appeal of the IRO decision has been or will be filed.

  (6) The IRO fees may include an amended notification of decision if the department determines the notification to be incomplete. The amended notification of decision shall be filed with the department no later than five working days from the IRO's receipt of such notice from the department. The amended notification of decision does not alter the deadlines for appeal.

  (7) If a requestor withdraws the request for an IRO decision after the IRO has been assigned by the department but before the IRO sends the case to an IRO reviewer, the requestor shall pay the IRO a withdrawal fee of $150 within 30 days of the withdrawal. If a requestor withdraws the request for an IRO decision after the case is sent to a reviewer, the requestor shall pay the IRO the full IRO review fee within 30 days of the withdrawal.

  (8) In addition to department enforcement action, the division may assess an administrative fee in accordance with Labor Code §413.020 and §133.305 of this subchapter.

  (9) This section shall not be deemed to require an employee to pay for any part of a review. If application of a provision of this section would require an employee to pay for part of the cost of a review, that cost shall instead be paid by the insurance carrier.

(r) Defense. An insurance carrier may claim a defense to a medical necessity dispute if the insurance carrier timely complies with the IRO decision with respect to the medical necessity or appropriateness of health care for an injured employee. Upon receipt of an IRO decision for a retrospective medical necessity dispute that finds that medical necessity exists, the insurance carrier must review, audit, and process the bill. In addition, the insurance carrier shall tender payment consistent with the IRO decision, and issue a new explanation of benefits (EOB) to reflect the payment within 21 days upon receipt of the IRO decision. The decision of an IRO under Labor Code §413.031(m) is binding during the pendency of a dispute.

Cont'd...

Next Page Previous Page

Link to Texas Secretary of State Home Page | link to Texas Register home page | link to Texas Administrative Code home page | link to Open Meetings home page