<<Prev Rule

Texas Administrative Code

Next Rule>>
TITLE 30ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
PART 1TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
CHAPTER 7MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING
RULE §7.124Natural Resource Trustees Memorandum of Understanding

differences cannot be resolved, the Trustees maintain the right to independently provide comments to the TNRCC PM and/or person requesting to conduct the ecological services analysis, either as a unified group of two or more Trustees or as a single Trustee.

      (iii) Recognition of comments. The TNRCC ecological risk assessor shall evaluate the Trustee comments and the TNRCC PM shall incorporate them into the TNRCC's response to the person, as appropriate. The TNRCC PM shall inform the person in writing of the results of the TNRCC/Trustee consultation and shall copy the Trustees on such correspondence. If any Trustee comments are not incorporated, the Trustees shall be informed.

    (D) Coordination of meetings. After the timely receipt of a Trustee's written intent to participate in the consultation on the person's request to perform an ecological services analysis, the TNRCC shall, to the extent practical, coordinate with the Trustees concerning their availability at least ten calendar days in advance of meetings concerning the person's request to perform an ecological services analysis. The TNRCC shall provide the Trustees notification of these meetings via electronic mail or via another mutually agreed upon method. The TNRCC and the Trustees shall work together to ensure that all parties to this MOU which are participating in the ecological services analysis process have input into that process and that reasonable time lines are established and met to ensure that Trustee involvement in the ecological services analysis does not impede progression of the ecological services analysis. In the event that any participating Trustee is unable to attend a meeting concerning the ecological services analysis, any absent Trustee shall contact the other Trustees to obtain information regarding the meeting and if necessary, shall contact the TNRCC ecological risk assessor within a reasonable time after the meeting to be briefed on the issues discussed.

  (2) Ecological services analysis cooperation and approval process. To enhance the coordination between the Trustees and the person and provide efficiencies in the development of the ecological services analysis, the Trustees will initiate a dialogue with the person in a timely manner to establish the nature and scope of a cooperative ecological services analysis. The Trustees will maintain open communications with the person and actively participate in the entire ecological services analysis.

    (A) Trustee interaction. Unless otherwise specified herein, cooperation between the Trustees in the development, review, and approval of the ecological services analysis shall be consistent with the September 1995 Memorandum of Agreement between the Trustees. The Trustees shall strive for consensus on all decisions related to the development and implementation of the ecological services analysis. The Trustees shall coordinate their efforts to ensure a single unified Trustee position is provided on all written comments/statements to the person.

    (B) Trustee technical team (TTT). For each affected property involving significant participation by two or more Trustees, the Trustees shall create a TTT to which a representative shall be designated by each Trustee. The Trustees agree to designate representatives to the TTT who, at a minimum, have: 1) the level of knowledge and expertise needed to effectively guide the ecological services analysis process; and 2) the level of authority necessary to make decisions on issues presented to the TTT. The TTT shall be responsible for, among other things, communications with the person, outlining the scope and objectives of the ecological services analysis with the person, identifying additional data needs, reviewing and approving ecological services analysis reports and work plans, overseeing implementation of such plans, and certifying the satisfactory completion of the compensatory ecological restoration, where appropriate. The TTT may take any other actions as necessary to carry out its duties under this MOU. The TNRCC Trustee shall act as Trustee team leader unless otherwise agreed to by all Trustees. The Trustee team leader shall be responsible for, among other things, the coordination and monitoring of the progress of the development of technical comments, and implementation of the ecological services analysis. The Trustee team leader shall also be responsible for the scheduling of meetings of the TTT and notifying TTT members of those meetings on a timely basis, preparing agendas for those meetings, acting as a central contact point for the TTT, and establishing and maintaining records and relevant documents related to the ecological services analysis. The Trustee team leader may delegate any of his or her duties to another Trustee with the concurrence of the TTT. The duties of the Trustee team leader do not provide the Trustee team leader with any decision-making rights beyond those normally held by each Trustee member of the TTT.

      (i) Approval and performance of the ecological services analysis. The Trustees agree that the TTT shall act timely to either approve the ecological services analysis or disapprove with comments which may include a recommendation for additional work. This process shall be repeated each time the revised ecological services analysis report is resubmitted until the ecological services analysis report is approved, rejected, or is withdrawn. If the TTT cannot reach agreement with the person or the person fails to perform the ecological services analysis as proposed, the Trustees shall refer the affected property back to the TNRCC for further decisions on remedial/corrective action. The TNRCC PM shall be kept informed of all TTT activities, shall be copied on all comments, and shall be invited to participate in all meetings with the person concerning performance of the ecological services analysis.

      (ii) Approval and completion of the compensatory ecological restoration. Upon reaching a final decision on all reports which involve compensatory ecological restoration, the Trustees shall provide a written statement to the person and the TNRCC PM of the Trustees' final decision. When the compensatory ecological restoration is completed consistent with Trustee-approved criteria, the TTT shall also provide a written statement to both the person and the TNRCC PM certifying satisfactory completion of the compensatory ecological restoration. If the compensatory ecological restoration is not completed to the Trustees' satisfaction, the Trustees shall refer the affected property back to the TNRCC for further decisions on remedial/corrective action.

    (C) Agreement. Where determined appropriate by the Trustees, the Trustees shall pursue a written agreement with a person conducting an ecological services analysis to govern Trustee coordination with that person. The agreement will include issues such as the payment of Trustees' costs associated with the ecological risk assessment and ecological services analysis processes, public participation requirements, and a mechanism for addressing natural resource damages liability, as applicable.

    (D) Dispute resolution. In the event of a dispute between any of the parties concerning activities under subsection (h)(2) of this MOU, the Trustee contacts shall attempt to resolve the dispute informally. If the dispute is not resolved informally at the Trustee contact level, any Trustee may invoke the following dispute resolution procedures by sending notice to all primary Trustee contacts involved in the dispute. Such notice must include a brief description of the disputed issue(s) and acceptable alternatives for resolution. The Trustee contacts shall elevate the dispute to the appropriate first tier agency representatives with successive elevations to second tier agency representatives and third tier agency representatives as necessary.

      (i) Within four calendar days after receiving the notice invoking dispute resolution, the Trustees involved in the dispute shall designate the names and titles of their first, second, and third tier agency representatives via electronic mail (or another mutually agreed upon method) to all primary Trustee contacts involved in the dispute.

      (ii) Within 14 calendar days after receiving the notice invoking dispute resolution, the first tier agency representatives involved in the dispute shall discuss the disputed issue(s), assisted by other technical or legal staff as appropriate. If the disputed issue(s) cannot be resolved by the first tier agency representatives within the 14 calendar days after receiving the notice, the disputed issue(s) shall be elevated by the first tier agency representatives to the second tier agency representatives within five calendar days after the expiration of the discussion period. The second tier agency representatives shall have 14 calendar days within which to discuss and attempt to resolve the disputed issue(s), assisted by other technical or legal staff as appropriate. If the disputed issue(s) cannot be resolved by the second tier agency representatives within the 14 calendar days after it is elevated, the disputed issue(s) shall be elevated by the second tier agency representatives to the third tier agency representatives within five calendar days after the expiration of the discussion period. The third tier agency representatives shall have 14 calendar days within which to discuss and attempt to resolve the disputed issue(s), assisted by other technical or legal staff as appropriate. If the third tier agency representatives Cont'd...

Next Page Previous Page

Link to Texas Secretary of State Home Page | link to Texas Register home page | link to Texas Administrative Code home page | link to Open Meetings home page