| (a) Accountability performance indicators. The State
Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) shall determine the accreditation
status of an educator preparation program (EPP) at least annually,
based on the following accountability performance indicators, disaggregated
by demographic group and other requirements of this chapter and determined
with the formulas and calculations included in the figure provided
in §229.1(c) of this title (relating to General Provisions and
Purpose of Accountability System for Educator Preparation Programs).
Data will be used only if the following indicators were included in
the accountability system for that academic year. Except for the 2019-2020
and 2020-2021 academic years, when the data described in paragraphs
(1)-(5) of this subsection will be reported to EPPs and will not be
used to determine accreditation statuses, EPP accreditation statuses
shall be based on:
(1) the EPP candidates' performance on pedagogy tests
and content pedagogy tests. The EPP candidates' performance on pedagogy
tests and content pedagogy tests shall provide separate accountability
performance indicators for EPPs;
(A) For both pedagogy tests and content pedagogy tests,
the performance standard shall be the percent of individuals admitted
after December 26, 2016, who passed an examination within the first
two attempts, including those examinations attempted after the individual
has completed the EPP or when the EPP has not recommended the individual
for a standard certificate. The pass rate is based solely on the examinations
approved by the EPP. Examinations taken before admission to the EPP
or specific examinations taken for pilot purposes are not included
in the pass rate.
(B) For the 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 academic years,
the Performance Assessment for School Leaders (PASL) shall be treated
as a content pedagogy test.
(C) For pedagogy tests, the performance standard shall
be a pass rate of 85%.
(D) For content pedagogy tests, the performance standard
shall be a pass rate of 75%.
(2) the results of appraisals of first-year teachers
by administrators, based on a survey in a form to be approved by the
SBEC. The performance standard shall be 70% of first-year teachers
from the EPP who are appraised as "sufficiently prepared" or "well
prepared";
(3) the growth of students taught by beginning teachers
as indicated by the STAAR Progress Measure, determined at the student
level as described in Figure: 19 TAC §97.1001(b) of Part II of
this title (relating to Accountability Rating System), and aggregated
at the teacher level as described in Figure: 19 TAC §229.1(c)
of this title. The performance standard shall be 70% of beginning
teachers from the EPP reaching the individual performance threshold.
The first two academic years for which the Texas Education Agency
(TEA) has data necessary to calculate this performance standard following
the 2019-2020 academic year will be reporting years only and will
not be used to determine accreditation status;
(4) the results of data collections establishing EPP
compliance with SBEC requirements specified in §228.35(g) of
this title (relating to Preparation Program Coursework and/or Training),
regarding the frequency, duration, and quality of field supervision
to candidates completing clinical teaching or an internship. The frequency
and duration of field supervision shall provide one accountability
performance indicator, and the quality of field supervision shall
provide a separate accountability performance indicator;
(A) The performance standard as to the frequency, duration,
and required documentation of field supervision shall be that the
EPP meets the requirements of documentation of §228.35(g) of
this title for 95% of the EPP's candidates. EPPs who do not meet the
standard of 95% for the aggregated group or for any disaggregated
demographic group but have only one candidate not meet the requirement
in the aggregated or any disaggregated group has met the standard
for that group.
(B) The performance standard for quality shall be 90%
of candidates rating the field supervision as "frequently" or "always
or almost always" providing the components of structural guidance
and ongoing support; and
(5) the results from a teacher satisfaction survey,
in a form approved by the SBEC, of new teachers administered at the
end of the first year of teaching under a standard certificate. The
performance standard shall be 70% of teachers responding that they
were "sufficiently prepared" or "well prepared" by their EPP.
(b) Accreditation status assignment. All approved EPPs
may be assigned an accreditation status based on their performance
in the Accountability System for Educator Preparation Programs (ASEP)
Index system, as described in Figure: 19 TAC §229.1(c) of this
title.
(1) Accredited status. An EPP shall be assigned an
Accredited status if the EPP has met the standard of 85% of the possible
points in the ASEP Index system as described in Figure: 19 TAC §229.1(c)
of this title and has been approved by the SBEC to prepare, train,
and recommend candidates for certification.
(2) Accredited-Not Rated status. An EPP shall be assigned
Accredited-Not Rated status upon initial approval to offer educator
preparation, until the EPP can be assigned a status based on the ASEP
Index system as described in Figure: 19 TAC §229.1(c) of this
title. An EPP is fully accredited and may recommend candidates for
certification while it is in Accredited-Not Rated status.
(3) Accredited-Warned status.
(A) An EPP shall be assigned Accredited-Warned status
if the EPP accumulates 80% or greater but less than 85% of the possible
points in the ASEP Index system as described in Figure: 19 TAC §229.1(c)
of this title.
(B) An EPP may be assigned Accredited-Warned status
if the SBEC determines that the EPP has violated SBEC rules, orders,
and/or Texas Education Code (TEC), Chapter 21.
(4) Accredited-Probation status.
(A) An EPP shall be assigned Accredited-Probation status
if the EPP accumulates less than 80% of the possible points in the
ASEP Index system as described in Figure: 19 TAC §229.1(c) of
this title.
(B) An EPP may be assigned Accredited-Probation status
if the SBEC determines that the EPP has violated SBEC rules, orders,
and/or TEC, Chapter 21.
(5) Not Accredited-Revoked status.
(A) An EPP shall be assigned Not Accredited-Revoked
status and its approval to recommend candidates for educator certification
revoked if it is assigned Accredited-Probation status for three consecutively
measured years.
(B) An EPP may be assigned Not Accredited-Revoked status
if the EPP has been on Accredited-Probation status for one year, and
the SBEC determines that revoking the EPP's approval is reasonably
necessary to achieve the purposes of the TEC, §21.045 and §21.0451.
(C) An EPP may be assigned Not Accredited-Revoked status
if the EPP fails to pay the required ASEP technology fee by the deadline
set by TEA as prescribed in §229.9(7) of this title (relating
to Fees for Educator Preparation Program Approval and Accountability).
(D) An EPP may be assigned Not Accredited-Revoked status
if the SBEC determines that the EPP has violated SBEC rules, orders,
and/or TEC, Chapter 21.
(E) An assignment of Not Accredited-Revoked status
and revocation of EPP approval to recommend candidates for educator
certification is subject to the requirements of notice, record review,
and appeal as described in this chapter.
(F) A revocation of an EPP approval shall be effective
for a period of two years, after which a program may reapply for approval
as a new EPP pursuant to Chapter 228 of this title (relating to Requirements
for Educator Preparation Programs).
(G) Upon revocation of EPP approval, the EPP may not
admit new candidates for educator certification but may complete the
training of candidates already admitted by the EPP and recommend them
for certification. If necessary, TEA staff and other EPPs shall cooperate
to assist the previously admitted candidates of the revoked EPP to
complete their training.
(c) Small group exception.
(1) For purposes of accreditation status determination,
the performance of an EPP candidate group, aggregated or disaggregated
by demographic group, shall be measured against performance standards
described in this chapter in any one year in which the number of individuals
in the group exceeds 10. The small group exception does not apply
to compliance with the frequency and duration of field supervisor
observations.
(2) For an EPP candidate group, aggregated or disaggregated
by demographic group, where the group contains 10 or fewer individuals,
the group's performance shall not be counted for purposes of accreditation
status determination for that academic year based on only that year's
group performance.
Cont'd... |
