<<Exit | Texas Register Preamble |
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ, agency, or commission) proposes amendments to §§335.1, 335.2, 335.29, 335.31, 335.47, 335.69, 335.76, 335.112, 335.116, 335.118, 335.125, 335.152, 335.163 - 335.166, 335.173, 335.175, 335.221, 335.224, 335.261, 335.431, 335.504, 335.582 - 335.584, and 335.590 - 335.593. The commission proposes new §335.601 and §335.602. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES The federal hazardous waste program is authorized under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), §3006. States may obtain authorization from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to administer the hazardous waste program at the state level. State authorization is a rulemaking process through which EPA delegates the primary responsibility of implementing the RCRA hazardous waste program to individual states in lieu of EPA. This process ensures national consistency and minimum standards while providing flexibility to states in implementing rules. State RCRA programs must always be at least as stringent as the federal requirements. Since the beginning of the federal hazardous waste program, the State of Texas has continuously participated in the EPA's authorization program. To maintain RCRA authorization, the commission must adopt regulations to meet the minimum standards of federal programs administered by EPA. Because the federal regulations undergo regular revision, the commission adopts new regulations periodically to meet the changing federal regulations. Texas received authorization of its hazardous waste "base program" under the RCRA on December 26, 1984. Texas received authorization for revisions to its base hazardous waste program on February 17, 1987 (Clusters I and II). Texas submitted further revisions to its hazardous waste program and received final authorization of those revisions on March 15, 1990, July 23, 1990, October 21, 1991, December 4, 1992, June 27, 1994, November 26, 1997, October 18, 1999, September 11, 2000 and June 14, 2005 (Clusters III - X). A RCRA authorization rule package for parts of RCRA Rule Clusters XI - XV was submitted to EPA Region VI on July 25, 2007. Texas is currently waiting on authorization of these clusters. (A cluster is a grouping of federal RCRA amendments during a one year period.) The commission proposes in this rule package to adopt parts of RCRA Rule Clusters XIV, XV, XVI, XVII and XVIII that implement revisions to the federal hazardous waste program, which were made by EPA between July 1, 2005 and June 30, 2008. Both mandatory and optional federal rule changes in these clusters are proposed to be adopted. Adoption of two of the federal rule changes is mandatory in order to maintain RCRA authorization. Although not necessary in order to maintain authorization, EPA also recommends that the optional federal rule changes be incorporated into the state rules. Establishing equivalency with federal regulations will enable the State of Texas to operate all aspects of the federal hazardous waste program in lieu of the EPA. All proposed rule changes are discussed below in the SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION. The Hazardous Waste Combustion Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) regulations are multi-media at the federal and state level, affecting both air quality and hazardous waste management. The TCEQ has already adopted certain parts of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 63, Subpart EEE (i.e., the Hazardous Waste Combustion MACT rules) prior to this rulemaking under air quality regulations at 30 TAC Chapter 113, Standards of Performance for Hazardous Air Pollutants and for Designated Facilities and Pollutants. The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to propose adoption of other parts of the federal combustion MACT program, which are encoded at 40 CFR Parts 264 - 266, and 270. This proposed rulemaking would incorporate those aspects of the combustion MACT rules affecting waste management as part of the changes to 30 TAC Chapters 305 and 335. A corresponding rulemaking is published in this issue of the Texas Register and includes changes to 30 TAC Chapter 305, Consolidated Permits. SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION The commission proposes administrative changes throughout the proposed rulemaking to reflect the agency's current practices and to conform to Texas Register and agency guidelines. These changes include updating references to Texas State Agencies, updating cross-references, and correcting typographical, spelling, and grammatical errors. §335.1, Definitions The commission proposes amending §335.1 to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the July 28, 2006, issue of the Federal Register (71 FR 42928). Specifically, this amendment would add the definitions of "cathode ray tube or CRT," "CRT collector," "CRT glass manufacturer," and "CRT processing" to the list of definitions. Subsequent paragraphs have been renumbered accordingly. This amendment is as stringent as the current state rules. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission also proposes amending §335.1 to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the January 2, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 57). Specifically, this amendment would add the definition of "gasification" to the list of definitions. This amendment is as stringent as the current state rules. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission also proposes amending §335.1(133)(A)(iv) to conform to regulations promulgated in the April 4, 2006 issue of the Federal Register (71 FR 16862). This amendment would reduce the paperwork burden for generators that exclude wood preserving wastewaters and spent wood preserving solutions from the definition of solid waste by no longer requiring a one-time notification stating that the plant intends to claim the exclusion. The generator will be required to maintain a copy of the notification in the on-site records for the life of the facility. This amendment is less stringent than the current state rules because it reduces the notification requirements that are currently in effect. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission also proposes amending §335.1(133)(A)(iv) to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the July 28, 2006 issue of the Federal Register (71 FR 42928). This amendment would exclude CRTs that meet the requirements in 40 CFR §261.4(a)(22) for reuse and recycling from classification as a solid waste. This exclusion is currently found in 40 CFR §261.4. This amendment is less stringent than the current state rules and will encourage recycling of CRTs. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission also proposes adding a definition for "standard permit" in §335.1(145) to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the September 8, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 53420). Specifically, this amendment would incorporate the availability of a standard permit to RCRA treatment, storage, and disposal facilities otherwise subject to RCRA permitting that generate and then store or non-thermally treat hazardous waste on-site in tanks, containers, and containment buildings. To be eligible for a standard permit, facilities must manage hazardous waste on-site in tanks, container storage areas, or containment buildings. Standardizing this aspect of the permitting process will reduce the amount of agency technical review and processing time required by the traditional RCRA permit process. In addition, the standard permit will streamline the permitting process by allowing facilities to obtain and modify permits more easily, while still achieving the same level of environmental protection as individual permits. For a proposed facility, an applicant may submit a standard permit application in lieu of a Part B application for those units that qualify for a standard permit. If additional hazardous waste units that do not qualify for a standard permit are to be permitted at the same facility, a Part B application must be submitted. If a permittee chooses to apply for a standard permit in lieu of submitting a Part B permit renewal application for a tank, container storage area, or containment building, a standard permit application must be submitted. If the current authorization also contains other hazardous waste management units not eligible for a standard permit, a Part B permit renewal application must be submitted for those units. A contested case hearing for a standard permit may be requested by the executive director, applicant, or Office of the Public Interest Council. The term limit for a standard permit is ten years. Because facility storage units must meet the same technical standards as units permitted under a traditional permit, the proposed amendment is more flexible but equivalent to the current state rules. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. §335.2, Permit Required The commission proposes adding new language at §335.2(o) to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the September 8, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 53420). This amendment would incorporate application requirements for a standard permit. Specifically, this amendment would incorporate the availability of a standard permit to RCRA treatment, storage, and disposal facilities otherwise subject to RCRA permitting that generate and then store or non-thermally treat hazardous waste on-site in tanks, containers, and containment buildings. Because facility storage units must meet the same technical standards as units permitted under a traditional permit, the proposed amendment is more flexible but equivalent to the current state rules. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission proposes amending §335.2(h)(8) to correct cross-referenced citations to sections in 30 TAC Chapter 330, Municipal Solid Waste, due to all sections of Chapter 330 being reorganized and amended in a previous rulemaking. The commission proposes amending §335.2(h)(8) to replace the reference of §330.136(b)(6)(B) - (E) with §330.171(c)(3)(B) - (E). This amendment is as stringent as the current state rules. §335.29, Adoption of Appendices by Reference The commission proposes amending §335.29(1) to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the June 14, 2005 issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 34538) and amended in the August 1, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 44150). This amendment would adopt by reference deletion of the requirement to use "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, EPA Publication SW-846." This amendment would eliminate the requirement that facility owners and operators use SW-846 sampling methods but would not eliminate the requirement that facility owners and operators receive prior approval for specific sampling methods from the executive director through approval of a sampling and analysis plan. Facility owners and operators may propose appropriate methods in their sampling and analysis plan. This amendment is less stringent but provides greater flexibility than the current rules and is protective of human health and the environment. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission also proposes amending §335.29(3) and (4) to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the July 14, 2006, issue of the Federal Register (71 FR 40254). This amendment would adopt by reference corrections to errors made in the CFR. This amendment is as stringent as the current state rules. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. §335.31, Incorporation of References The commission proposes amending §335.31 to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the June 14, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 34538) and as amended in the August 1, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 44150). This amendment would incorporate by reference revisions to references found in 40 CFR §260.11. Specifically, this amendment would update a number of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and SW-846 analytical methods to reflect the most recent available analytical methods. This amendment is at least as stringent as the current state rules. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission proposes amending §335.31 to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the September 8, 2005 issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 53420). Specifically, this amendment would incorporate the availability of a standard permit to RCRA treatment, storage, and disposal facilities otherwise subject to RCRA permitting that generate and then store or non-thermally treat hazardous waste on-site in tanks, containers, and containment buildings. Because facility storage units must meet the same technical standards as units permitted under a traditional permit, the proposed amendment is more flexible but equivalent to the current state rules. Because portions of the rule may be affected by more than one federal rule change, only the latest Federal Register citation appears in the rule text. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. §335.47, Special Requirements for Persons Eligible for a Federal Permit by Rule The commission proposes amending §335.47(c) to update language that clarifies an existing requirement that specific documents submitted in a Part B permit application must be signed and sealed by a Texas licensed professional engineer and/or Texas licensed professional geoscientist. This revised language would replace outdated language adopted from 40 CFR Part 264 previously that states that documents must be signed and sealed by a "registered professional engineer." The new language specifically states that documents must be signed and sealed by a "Texas licensed professional engineer and/or Texas licensed professional geoscientist." This proposed amendment is at least as stringent as the current state rules. This amendment is not required to maintain authorization. §335.69, Accumulation Time The commission proposes amending §335.69(a) and (m) to correct typographical errors that were made to referenced citations. Amendments to §335.69(a) and (m) were adopted in a previous rulemaking, and the corrections are required by EPA to maintain authorization. §335.76, Additional Requirements Applicable to International Shipments The commission proposes amending §335.76(a) and (h) to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the July 14, 2006, issue of the Federal Register (71 FR 40254). This amendment would incorporate by reference corrections to errors in the CFR. This amendment is as stringent as the current state rules. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. §335.112, Standards The commission proposes amending §335.112(a)(1), (3), (6), (8) - (13), (16), (18) - (20), and (22) to conform to federal regulations promulgated through the July 14, 2006, issue of the Federal Register (71 FR 40254). This amendment would incorporate by reference corrections to errors made in the CFR. As indicated below some of these sections are impacted by other federal rule changes. The latest Federal Register citation appears in the proposed text. This amendment is as stringent as the current state rules. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission proposes amending §335.112(a)(1), (4) - (6), (8) - (11), (13), (18), (20), and (22) to conform to federal regulations promulgated in the April 4, 2006 issue of the Federal Register (71 FR 16862). This amendment would adopt by reference requirements that reduce the recordkeeping and reporting burden imposed on the regulated community by ensuring that only the information needed and used to implement the hazardous waste program is collected from facilities. This amendment is less stringent than the current state rules, but the reduction in recordkeeping poses minimal risk to human health or the environment. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission proposes amending §335.112(a)(1) to clarify that emergency response training for facility personnel required by safety regulations can fulfill the requirements of this section. This amendment is as stringent as the current state rules. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission proposes amending §335.112(a)(4) to revise the default retention time for manifests and other records from 'until closure' to three years, unless otherwise specified. Records of wastes received, the location and quantity of all hazardous wastes placed in disposal cells, groundwater monitoring, and response action plans would continue to be required to be kept until closure. Closure and post-closure cost estimates, along with monitoring and analytical data would be required to be kept until closure. This amendment is less stringent than the current state rules, but the reduction in recordkeeping poses minimal risk to human health or the environment. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission proposes amending §335.112(a)(5) to no longer require the submission of groundwater quality assessment plans, but to maintain them in the facility operating file until closure of the site. This amendment is less stringent than the current state rules, but the reduction in reporting poses minimal risk to human health or the environment. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. The commission proposes amending §335.112(a)(6) to require only annual instead of semi-annual submission of corrective action progress reports to address equipment leaks. This amendment is less stringent than the current state rules, but the reduction in reporting poses minimal risk to human health or the environment. This amendment is recommended by EPA to be adopted into state rules, but is not required to maintain authorization. Cont'd... |
Next Page Previous Page